|
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Login: 11/4/2009 7:08:25 PM
Posts: 4,164,
Visits: 2,687
|
|
| As aquarists, we often struggle with light issues: - when to change old lamps and how many of a multiple to change at one time - will the new coral I'm buying suffer light shock in my tank and how can I avoid that - is my new or current light canopy in the optimal position and are my lamsp close enough, too far or too close to the water - does this window or greenhouse glazing offer enough or too much sunlight? - does the light I'm using have not only enough intensity, but enough PAR(!) to keep my reef corals and creatures alive There are many more challenges we encounter that could readily be addressed with the use of a PAR meter. A keyword search of the Internet will reveal other authors such as Sanjay Joshi and Dana Riddle of Riddle laboratories with published articles on this issue. I like and recommend a PAR meter for all non-casual aquarists. Most of us have many thousands of dollars invested in our reef systems. A couple hundred dollar investment in a light meter can make a huge difference in the success and health of the aquarium. Several members of this board own the brand below and like it well. I agree FWIW: http://www.apogee-inst.com/bqm_spec.htm Re: which to choose, you must ask yourself: are you measuring electric lamps, sunlight or both? Do you want a water proof sensor or not? My advice is to get all of the above if you can afford it my friend: Model QMSW-SS (and to be clear - I do not know these people or this company, I have never taken a free product sample or any sort of comp from them... and MD does not sell these units presently (nor have plans). It's simply a good brand/product that stands on its' own merit. Hence my recommendation.)
. Anthony Calfo
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 4/26/2007 6:23:26 AM
Posts: 8,
Visits: 31
|
|
| Hi Antony, Sorry to drag up an old thread, but how would you use one of these light meters? How would you know when a lamp needed changing? what % drop in intensity are we looking for? what sort of intensities do we want for different corals etc? Thanks in advance Keith
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:59:38 PM
Posts: 1,049,
Visits: 3,977
|
|
Good questions Keith & I was wondering the same thing?
Also Anthony, how would one convert LUX meter readings to PAR? Reason being that I do have a LUX unit presently. Thanks
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Login: 11/4/2009 7:08:25 PM
Posts: 4,164,
Visits: 2,687
|
|
| you will see/can find references to readings taken on the reef... and readings taken by aquarists in various places (keyword searches on the Net BBs and even general search engines). I cannot tell you what exact reading to target when I do not know what species you are growing, if you are doing monocultures, etc. For starters though... do take a peek and see the PAR reading you get outside on a cloudy day. Then compare that to the PAR reading you get under artificial lights that have been uised to keep/grow corals well. Very simple but telling experiments. Are you at least getting 100-300 PAR? For more science information (like how to convert lux )... the Net is an amazing tool Please do be resourceful my friends rather than wait for simple answers/enabling. If it helps you... of the many informative threads and info I have collected or built for you/aquatics friends, you will see a very nice science URL in my recommended links in the sticky atop this forum called "Fav links...": http://science.howstuffworks.com * the name says it all... "How Stuff Works"
. Anthony Calfo
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:59:38 PM
Posts: 1,049,
Visits: 3,977
|
|
That's one great site Anthony! Thanks, even if it did mean doing some "homework"!! 
For those of you interested this is what I found regarding conversion of PAR to LUX & vice versa:
"To get Lux reading you need to multiply PAR by:
Sun - 55.2
Incandescent lamp 49.0
Cool white 78.8
Vita-Lite 62.8
Gro-Lux 37.0
Gro-Lux Wide Spectrum 55.1
HPS 83.3
MH Lamp 74.5"
This appears to be very generalized but would be somewhere "in the ballpark".
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Login: 11/4/2009 7:08:25 PM
Posts: 4,164,
Visits: 2,687
|
|
Thank you for indulging me and for coming back and sharing your findings, Steve It is a principal aspiration in my life to be a teacher/mentor... and not an enabler. Its tough to finesse that line sometimes without seeming grumpy or brusque But you have done well by me/us, my friend. Thank you for digging/learning and sharing.
. Anthony Calfo
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:59:38 PM
Posts: 1,049,
Visits: 3,977
|
|
You are very welcome my friend! 
Oh, and thanks for your tutelage & looking out for us aquarist!! 
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5/17/2006 3:07:42 PM
Posts: 20,
Visits: 95
|
|
| Anthony that site is amazing. Thanks for bringing attention to the link.
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Moderators
Last Login: 11/4/2009 7:08:25 PM
Posts: 4,164,
Visits: 2,687
|
|
I'm truly glad to share my friend(s). It's important that we all give info as freely as we take/find/learn it
.Anthony Calfo
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5/17/2006 3:07:42 PM
Posts: 20,
Visits: 95
|
|
| Anthony, I just talked with a biologist friend of mine and he says that there is no direct conversion between lux/par. PAR measures photosynthetically active radiation only, so how does it take into account the rest of the light, it doesn’t, so how can it be used to derive a measurement of that light (non PAR light)? What is your opinion on this? Thanks, Ben
|
|
|
|