Marinedepot.com Forums
Prodibio Additives/Supplements
Marine Depot Forums
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        


«««45678

Egg-grate/egg-crate/Lighting grid over... Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 3/28/2006 4:49:45 PM


 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:38:36 PM
Posts: 230, Visits: 745
We continue to differ, perhaps as a matter of definition, on the efficiency question and as to whether there's an overall net increase of light entering the aquarium with the eggcrate in place.  Certainly there is more light within the orange region depicted above.  Would you agree that adopting Sanjay's "Total Incident Par" technique and measuring a grid of points within both the yellow and orange regions shown in the diagram above gives an adequate answer as to the overall efficiency/net increase question?

That aside, you raise another interesting point.  For there to be the light increase shown in the orange region, light has to be traveling at an angle through that point.  That suggests that the eggcrate will result in more side-lighting of objects in the tank than the primarily vertical lighting produced by parabolic reflectors.  If I infer correctly from my reading of your numerous posts about light rails, that'd be a good thing.

- Mark

Post #30975
Posted 3/28/2006 10:12:53 PM


 

Group: Moderators
Last Login: 11/4/2009 7:08:25 PM
Posts: 4,164, Visits: 2,687
heehee... I agree that we still differ And I don't think part of it is a matter of perception or definition. There is either more light entering the aquarium and reaching the targeted animals or there is not. This is about as black and white as it gets. My assertion is that with a grid under light systems that have spreading light (because of reflectors, lamp styles... whatever), there is simply more light making it into in the aquarium where we want it overall. Net gain is my mantra here 

My favoritism for moving light points/systems actually does not come into play versus the grid issue since a principal purpose of the former is energy efficiency (using less lamps/less watts) by exploiting directional lighting while in the case of the latter we are all about capturing the greatest quantity of light from traditional lighting (read: less energy efficient static sources). Its apples and oranges.

.

Anthony Calfo

Post #30992
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

«««45678

Permissions Expand / Collapse

All times are GMT -8:00, Time now is 4:50pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.3 © 2009
Execution: 0.391. 7 queries. Compression Disabled.